23 Are You Putting the Spine in Jeopardy?
Printer Friendly Email a Friend PDF

Dynamic Chiropractic – June 1, 2017, Vol. 35, Issue 06

Are You Putting the Spine in Jeopardy?

By Thomas Michaud, DC

Every chiropractor knows a strong, well-coordinated core is essential for maintaining spinal health. Unfortunately, none of the typically prescribed core exercises targets the most active core muscle: the diaphragm.

The Role of the Diaphragm in Supporting the Spine

In the course of a lifetime, the diaphragm, which is absent in birds and reptiles, contracts nearly half a billion times, creating a negative pressure in the thorax that fills the lungs with air, while maintaining a constant intra-abdominal pressure that provides stability to the spine when lifting and balancing.1

The protective role the diaphragm has in preventing low back injuries is borne out in several studies. Animal research confirms electrically-evoked diaphragm contractions enhance mechanical support of the spine.2 Human studies demonstrate that individuals with low back pain are more likely to present with smaller diaphragm excursions and higher diaphragm positions than asymptomatic individuals.3

The suboptimal diaphragm location forces the individual to increase their tidal volume during lifting in order to generate sufficient intra-abdominal pressure. In addition, research suggests the diaphragms of individuals with low back pain fatigue more rapidly and to a greater extent compared to healthy controls.4

The important role the diaphragm plays in protecting the spine is supported by research showing that individuals with impaired pulmonary function, such as COPD, are much more likely to develop low back pain.5

In an interesting EMG study, Hodges and Gandevia1 found the diaphragm is routinely activated during tasks that challenge stability of the spine, such as ballistic arm movements. These researchers note the diaphragm enhances stability by contracting before limb movements occur, and the intensity of diaphragmatic activation corresponds with the amplitude of forces perturbing the spine.

spine diagram - Copyright – Stock Photo / Register Mark FIG 1 The diaphragm: lumbar (A), costal (B), and sternal parts (C); venal caval foramen (D); esophageal hiatus (E) and aortic hiatus (F); right (G) and left crus (H); and central tendon (I). The diaphragm serves the dual purpose of constantly working to control airflow for breathing, while also working with the transverse abdominus muscle to maintain a constant intra-abdominal pressure in order to stabilize the spine and protect against postural instability. Some research suggests the transverse abdominus, but not the internal/external oblique and/or rectus abdominus muscles, has separate populations of motor units to control postural and respiratory functions.6

The Consequences of Diaphragm Dysfunction

Perhaps the most interesting evaluations of diaphragm function come from Belgium, where research suggests a weak diaphragm can impair core proprioception by decreasing sensitivity of spindles located in the erector spinae muscles.7 Apparently, because oxygen is necessary for our survival, the central nervous system prioritizes the delivery of blood to the diaphragm over other skeletal muscles.

When the diaphragm fatigues with exercise, the central nervous system deliberately decreases blood flow to spinal and peripheral muscles in order to shunt as much blood as possible to the diaphragm. If an individual's diaphragm is weak, it prematurely fatigues and blood is redirected away from peripheral muscles to enhance diaphragmatic circulation. Several studies have shown significant reductions in blood flow to the erector spinae and lower extremity muscles when the diaphragm is deliberately exhausted.8-9

The Low Back Connection

Where this gets interesting is the effect that decreased spinal and peripheral muscle circulation has on muscle spindles. Because muscle spindles are highly vascular structures that exist almost exclusively in slow-twitch muscle fibers,10 even a slight reduction of blood flow to a spindle, as would occur with premature fatigue of the diaphragm causing a reflex reduction in blood flow to the erector spinae, would markedly impair muscle coordination in the spine and extremity muscles. Impaired coordination of the spinal stabilizers is significant because it is correlated with the development of low back injury.11

To prove diaphragm fatigue reduces low back proprioception, a team of researchers designed a fascinating study in which they placed small oscillating motors on soleus muscles as patients balanced with closed eyes. Because muscle vibration at 60 cps with 0.5 mm displacement stimulates the muscle spindle Ia afferents,12 these specially designed vibrating motors give the test subject the illusion the specific muscle being vibrated is lengthening.

When an individual has faulty core proprioception, stimulation of the soleus muscle with vibration gives the subject a sense that their calf muscles are lengthening and they immediately shift their body weight back in order to protect against falling forward. If the muscle spindles in their low back were working properly, the core muscles would sense that the soleus muscles were not actually lengthening.

Using muscle vibration, researchers can identify whether individuals are incorporating multisegmental proprioceptive control, in which both core and ankle proprioceptors are used equally; or an ankle-steered control, in which core proprioception is impaired and subjects rely more heavily on ankle proprioceptors.

Janssens, et al.,7 demonstrated that the diaphragm can redirect blood flow from the erector spinae, thereby reducing core proprioception, by evaluating back muscle oxygenation using near-infrared spectroscopy before and after fatiguing the diaphragm in individuals with multi-segmental proprioceptive control and ankle-steered proprioceptive control (as determined with the vibrating motors).

Their detailed evaluation confirmed that individuals who are overreliant on ankle proprioceptors had significant reductions in back muscle oxygenation and blood volume with inspiratory fatigue. In contrast, individuals with multisegmental proprioceptive control had no reduction in back muscle oxygenation when their muscles of inspiration were exhausted.

These researchers claim a fatigued diaphragm steals blood from the spinal stabilizers, decreasing reliance on core proprioceptors, greatly increasing the risk of injury. Their research is significant, as it explains why individuals using ankle-steered proprioceptive strategies are more likely to develop low back pain.13

To see if the impaired core proprioception could be reversed with diaphragm exercises, Janssens, et al.,14 performed another study in which they had individuals with low back pain undergo inspiratory muscle training. The test subjects performed three sets of 20 repetitions at either 60 percent full effort (high-intensity group) or 20 percent full effort (low-intensity group).

After eight weeks of training, individuals treated with the high-intensity training exhibited smaller responses to ankle muscle vibration, improved core proprioception, higher inspiratory muscle strength, and most importantly, reduced low back pain severity. The authors note that these changes were not seen after low-intensity inspiratory muscle training.

Clinical Application

While the typical clinician does not have access to vibrating motors and force platforms, a simple way to evaluate core proprioception is to have the patient stand barefooted on a foam balance pad. Because the soft foam makes it difficult to rely on ankle proprioceptors, the standing patient is forced to rely on back muscle spindles which, when intact, allow the patient to balance with eyes closed while standing on foam with minimal sway.

Exaggerated amounts of sway, which can exceed 3-4 inches in the sagittal plane, are common with impaired core proprioception.

The impaired spinal proprioception is readily corrected with an eight-week training protocol that takes just a few minutes a day. From personal experience, the improved function associated with diaphragmatic breathing exercises occurs more rapidly when done in conjunction with joint and soft-tissue mobilization, both of which have been theorized to improve spinal proprioception.

References

  1. Hodges PW, Gandevia SC. Changes in intra-abdominal pressure during postural and respiratory activation of the human diaphragm. J Appl Physiol, 2000;89(3):967-76.
  2. Hodges P, Kaigle Holm A, et al. Intervertebral stiffness of the spine is increased by evoked contraction of transversus abdominis and the diaphragm: in vivo porcine studies. Spine, 2003;28:2594-2601.
  3. Kolar P, Sulc J, Kyncl M, et al. Postural function of the diaphragm in persons with and without chronic low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 2012;42(4):352-62.
  4. Janssens L, Brumagne S, McConnell AK, et al. Greater diaphragm fatigability in patients with recurrent low back pain. Respir Physiol Neurobiol, 2013;188(2):119-23.
  5. Ibid.
  6. Puckree T, Cerny F, and Bishop B. Abdominal motor unit activity during respiratory and nonrespiratory tasks. J Appl Physiol, 1998;84:1707-1715.
  7. Janssens L, Pijnenburg M, Claeys K, et al. Postural strategy and back muscle oxygenation during inspiratory muscle loading. Med Sci Sport Exerc, 2013;45(7):1355-62.
  8. Harms CA, Babcock MA, McClaran SR, et al. Respiratory muscle work compromises leg blood flow during maximal exercise. J Appl Physiol, 1997;82:1573-1583.
  9. Borghi-Silva A, Oliveira C, Carrascosa C, et al. A respiratory muscle unloading improves leg muscle oxygenation during exercise in patients with COPD. Thorax, 2008;63:910-915.
  10. Kokkorogiannis T. Somatic and intramuscular distribution of muscle spindles and their relation to muscular angiotypes. J Theoretical Biology, 2004;229(2):263-280.
  11. Claeys K, Brumagne S, Dankaerts W, et al. Decreased variability in postural control strategies in young people with non-specific low back pain is associated with altered proprioceptive reweighting. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2011:111:115-123.
  12. Cordo PJ, Gurfinkel VS, Brumagne S, Flores-Vieira C. Effect of slow, small movement on the vibration-evoked kinesthetic illusion. Exp Brain Res, 2005;167(3):324-34.
  13. Claeys K, et al. Young individuals with a more ankle-steered proprioceptive control strategy may develop mild nonspecific low back pain. J Electromyogr Kinesiol, 2015;25(2):329-338.
  14. Janssens L, McConnell AK, Pijnenburg M, et al. Inspiratory muscle training affects proprioceptive use and low back pain. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2014;47(1):12-19.

Click here for more information about Thomas Michaud, DC.


To report inappropriate ads, click here.