AASP articles, a "Talk Back" forum and a brief biography of members are available online at www.chiroweb.com/columnist/aasp.
A 45-year-old female slipped on a wet floor in a store.
The lawyer found a semi-retired chiropractor in another part of the country; he signed an affidavit stating the client would not have suffered the pain if she had not received chiropractic manipulative therapy (CMT). This "expert" witness said he was prepared to say that the woman was not a candidate for CMT.
In the discovery process prior to taking depositions, the woman's lawyer found out that she had seen a neurosurgeon during the course of her treatment with the chiropractic physician. The patient apparently had referred herself to the neurosurgeon. The neurosurgeon's records stated that he had examined the patient, reviewed her radiological studies and recommended that she continue her conservative therapy. Upon finding there was a neurosurgeon supportive of her chiropractic care - stating that the CMT should continue - the lawyer knew that he could not overcome the opinion of the neurosurgeon, and withdrew the lawsuit.
The Point
Although the chiropractic physician and the neurosurgeon never met and did not know of one another, the neurosurgeon's support of chiropractic care for this patient ended up saving the chiropractor years of grief dealing with a frivolous lawsuit.
Academic Board
American Academy of Spine Physicians
Elgin, Illinois
www.spinephysicians.org
