Read the introductory paragraphs to Dr. Steven Salzberg's Feb. 12, 2018 article in Forbes magazineand you'll instantly appreciate why the Foundation for Chiropractic Progress (F4CP) was quick to prepare a written response:
Here's a quick way for the U.S. government to save over half a billion dollars. Stop paying for coverage of medical procedures that have no evidence to support them and that are little more than quackery.
I'm talking about chiropractic and osteopathic manipulation. These are similar but distinct belief systems, both involving bones, and both with no evidence to back them up.
Immediately after the article appeared online, the F4CP crafted a letter to the editor for submission to the magazine. The thrust of the letter asserts: "The claims made by Steven Salzberg ... [suggesting] that spinal manipulation performed by doctors of chiropractic is ineffective in the management of pain from injured or aching backs is inaccurate and refuted by evidence-based research."
The foundation tackles Salzberg's primary claim of wasted money head-on, referencing a 2015 Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine study that found, according to the F4CP letter, that "chiropractic care may reduce the number of Medicare patient visits to primary care medical physicians for back and/or neck pain, resulting in $83.5 million in annual savings." (Emphasis added)
The letter also cites a 2018 systemic review and meta-analysis in The Spine Journal on the efficacy of spinal manipulation and mobilization as performed by DCs for chronic low back pain; the 2017 Harvard Health Letter report that "recommends chiropractic care to 'relieve back pain, improve function, and help the body heal itself'"; and several recent guidelines that recommend chiropractic care as a primary nondrug pain-management option.
Dynamic Chiropractic editorial staff members research, investigate and write articles for the publication on an ongoing basis. To contact the Editorial Department or submit an article of your own for consideration, email
.