2 Affirmation and Rebirth of the Chiropractic Profession, Part 2
Printer Friendly Email a Friend PDF RSS Feed
Dynamic Chiropractic – April 23, 2007, Vol. 25, Issue 09

Affirmation and Rebirth of the Chiropractic Profession, Part 2

Setting New Standards in Office-Based Musculoskeletal Care and Health Promotion

By Alex Vasquez, DC, ND, DO

Editor's note: Part 1 of this article appeared in the April 9 issue. For online access, visit www.chiroweb.com/archives/25/08/02.html.

So, why is it that a profession with so much current promise and future potential is so undervalued, underutilized and underfunded? In order to understand and describe the limitations placed on the chiropractic profession, and the limitations placed on patients who could benefit from enhanced access to chiropractic care, we have to look at limiting forces that exist inside and outside the profession.

Limitations From Outside

The American Medical Association (AMA) and other powerful pharmacosurgical groups conspired to destroy the chiropractic profession,55,56 the osteopathic profession57 and the naturopathic profession, and hence limit Americans' right to choose their health care. The details of these events and the resulting court order are well-documented and widely accessible.58-61 There can be no doubt that these illegal actions by the AMA and its co-conspirators set the chiropractic profession back considerably by measures of income, professional advancement, cultural authority, esteem and internal cohesion. Thus, by each one of these measures, the illegal AMA conspiracy was and continues to be a remarkable success.

Even today, the AMA is spearheading nationwide actions to further limit the practices of non-allopathic professionals.62 This is a problem in Texas, for example, where the well-funded Texas Medical Association recently sued the Texas Board of Chiropractic Examiners to enforce restrictions in the scope of chiropractic practice.63 Medical journals and associations continue to defame the chiropractic profession, even when the scientific bases for such defamatory actions are unfounded.64-66 Insurance companies and so-called "health maintenance organizations" limit chiropractic reimbursement and coverage, and thereby restrict patients' access to care and the individual practitioner's ability to survive and thrive. Since a profession can never exceed the average success of its members, different groups collectively succeed in restricting the profession by restricting the practices of individual doctors. Defamation and marginalization of the profession undermine attempts to gain federal and private funding for better faculty, facilities and research, and lack of these resources promotes additional devaluation and marginalization; thus, a vicious cycle is created.

Limitations From Inside

The intensity of the AMA's conspiracy forced early chiropractors to adopt the use of non-medical jargon so that chiropractic practice would not be misconstrued as "practicing medicine without a license," thereby saving chiropractors from the medical witch-hunt that generally aimed to jail the practitioner and burn their practice and reputation at the stake.67 Rejection of medical concepts and terminology eventually morphed from "anti-medical" to "anti-scientific" in some chiropractic colleges and organizations, such that a sizable and vocal faction of chiropractic graduates entered practice with a disdain for words and phrases like diagnosis, treatment, spinal manipulation and lab tests. These graduates were led to believe that the chiropractic profession did nothing more than "analyze" and "adjust" the spine, and that using lab tests and nutritional supplements made them "too medical."

Thankfully, authentic chiropractic holism is being revitalized in individual practitioners and the profession. Obviously, we as a profession can waste no time or attention on anti-scientific dogmatists who retard the advancement of our profession under the guise of a limited and self-serving interpretation of "chiropractic philosophy," which often devolves into a kind of "chiropractic evangelism," based on the belief that the "adjustment cures all." Anyone who advocates that the chiropractic profession is concerned only with the spine - to the exclusion of the rest of the body, and other factors that affect health - has misunderstood, misrepresented and limited our profession.

The Rebirth of the Chiropractic Profession

The time has come for the chiropractic profession to reaffirm and reunite with its original holistic identity. D.D. Palmer wrote, "The human body represents the actions of three laws-spiritual, mechanical, and chemical-united as one triune. As long as there is perfect union of these three, there is health."68 The chiropractic profession has been holistic and "integrative" since its very inception.69

Four of the biggest threats to the American public health are 1) skyrocketing medical costs, resulting in bankruptcy and health care inaccessibility;70 2) a nationwide shortage of physicians, further contributing to increased costs and inaccessibility; 3) lifestyle diseases such as obesity, diabetes and hypertension; and 4) medical iatrogenesis, conservatively estimated to be the fourth to sixth leading cause of death in America.71

Increased utilization of chiropractic services would have a salutary effect on each and every one of these problems. The modern definition of the chiropractic profession clearly affirms and articulates our holistic tenets, and our practices should reflect this diagnostic and therapeutic diversity: "Doctors of chiropractic are physicians who consider man as an integrated being and give special attention to the physiological and biochemical aspects, including structural, spinal, musculoskeletal, neurological, vascular, psychological, nutritional, visceral, emotional and environmental relationships."72

The American public has made its position very clear: They want nonmedical and nonsurgical health care options; they prefer safe and effective natural treatments over expensive and often hazardous drugs and surgery. The chiropractic profession is uniquely positioned to take on an empowered role in the American health care system. Chiropractic doctors should embrace their holistic heritage and provide the American people with the safe and effective integrative health care it demands and deserves. Public demand is on our side.73 The research is on our side.2 The days of "submission for survival" are past.67 The time for action, reaffirmation, and authentic and assertive empowerment has arrived.

References

  1. Woolf A, Pfleger B. Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2003;81:646-656. www.who.int/entity/bulletin/volumes/81/9/Woolf.pdf.
  2. Vasquez A. Integrative Orthopedics, Second Edition 2007. http://optimalhealthresearch.com/orthopedics.html.
  3. For samples of suggested competencies, see http://optimalhealthresearch.com/competencies.htmland download the PDF document of more than 100 questions and competencies.
  4. Freedman KB, Bernstein J. The adequacy of medical school education in musculoskeletal medicine. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80(10):1421-7.
  5. Freedman KB, Bernstein J. Educational deficiencies in musculoskeletal medicine. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84-A(4):604-8.
  6. Joy EA, Hala SV. Musculoskeletal curricula in medical education: filling in the missing pieces. The Physician and Sportsmedicine. 2004; 32: 42-45.
  7. Matzkin E, Smith ME, Freccero CD, Richardson AB. Adequacy of education in musculoskeletal medicine. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Feb;87-A(2):310-4.
  8. Schmale GA. More evidence of educational inadequacies in musculoskeletal medicine. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Aug;(437):251-9.
  9. Stockard AR, Allen TW. Competence levels in musculoskeletal medicine: comparison of osteopathic and allopathic medical graduates. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2006 Jun;106(6):350-5.
  10. Humphreys BK, Sulkowski A, McIntyre K, Kasiban M, Patrick AN. An examination of musculoskeletal cognitive competency in chiropractic interns. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2007 Jan;30(1):44-9.
  11. Brandt KD. Effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on chondrocyte metabolism in vitro and in vivo. Am J Med. 1987 Nov 20; 83(5A): 29-34. "At ... concentrations comparable to those ... in the synovial fluid of patients treated with the drug, several NSAIDs suppress proteoglycan synthesis... These NSAID related effects on chondrocyte metabolism ... are much more profound in osteoarthritic cartilage than in normal cartilage, due to enhanced uptake of NSAIDs by the osteoarthritic cartilage."
  12. Prathapkumar KR, Smith I, Attara GA. Indomethacin induced avascular necrosis of head of femur. Postgrad Med J. 2000 Sep; 76(899): 574-5. "The case of a young healthy man, who developed avascular necrosis of head of femur after prolonged administration of indomethacin, is reported here."
  13. Newman NM, Ling RS. Acetabular bone destruction related to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The Lancet 1985 Jul 6; 2(8445):11-4. "This highly significant association between NSAID use and acetabular destruction gives cause for concern, not least because of the difficulty in achieving satisfactory hip replacements in patients with severely damaged acetabula."
  14. Vidal y Plana RR, Bizzarri D, Rovati AL. Articular cartilage pharmacology: I. In vitro studies on glucosamine and non steroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Pharmacol Res Commun. 1978 Jun;10(6):557-69.
  15. Singh G. Recent considerations in nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug gastropathy. Am J Med. 1998;105(1B):31S-38S. "Conservative calculations estimate that approximately 107,000 patients are hospitalized annually for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-related gastrointestinal (GI) complications and at least 16,500 NSAID-related deaths occur each year among arthritis patients alone. The figures for all NSAID users would be overwhelming, yet the scope of this problem is generally under-appreciated."
  16. "Monsanto Co. and Pfizer Inc. said prescriptions for their anti-arthritis drug, Celebrex, totaled 7.4 million in the first six month of sales - making it the most successful U.S. drug launch ever." Monsanto, Pfizer celebrate Celebrex. St. Louis Business Journal July 20, 1999. http://www.bizjournals.com/stlouis/stories/1999/07/19/daily5.html.
  17. Markowitz GS, Falkowitz DC, Isom R, Zaki M, Imaizumi S, Appel GB, D'Agati VD. Membranous glomerulopathy and acute interstitial nephritis following treatment with celecoxib. Clin Nephrol. 2003;59(2):137-42.
  18. Grieco A, Miele L, Giorgi A, Civello IM, Gasbarrini G. Acute cholestatic hepatitis associated with celecoxib. Ann Pharmacother. 2002;36(12):1887-9.
  19. Berger P, Dwyer D, Corallo CE. Toxic epidermal necrolysis after celecoxib therapy. Pharmacotherapy. 2002 Sep;22(9):1193-5. See also: Friedman B, Orlet HK, Still JM, Law E. Toxic epidermal necrolysis due to administration of celecoxib (Celebrex). South Med J. 2002;95(10):1213-4.
  20. Topol EJ. Failing the public health--rofecoxib, Merck, and the FDA. N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 21;351(17):1707-9.
  21. David J. Graham, MD, MPH, (Associate Director for Science, Office of Drug Safety, U.S. FDA) estimated that 139,000 Americans who took Vioxx suffered serious side effects; he estimated that the drug killed between 26,000 and 55,000 people. http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0223-35.htm http://www.fda.gov/cder/drug/infopage/vioxx/vioxxgraham.pdf (accessed Nov. 25, 2006).
  22. Moseley JB, O'Malley K, Petersen NJ, Menke TJ, Brody BA, Kuykendall DH, Hollingsworth JC, Ashton CM, Wray NP. A controlled trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:81-8.
  23. Bernstein J, Quach T. A perspective on the study of Moseley et al: questioning the value of arthroscopic knee surgery for osteoarthritis. Cleve Clin J Med. 2003;70(5):401, 405-6, 408-10.
  24. Gina Kolata. "A Knee Surgery for Arthritis Is Called Sham." TheNew York Times, July 11, 2002.
  25. Carragee E. Surgical treatment of lumbar disk disorders. JAMA 2006 Nov 22;296(20):2485-7. "These findings suggest that in most cases there is no clear reason to advocate strongly for surgery apart from patient preference."
  26. Holland EG, Degruy FV. Drug-induced disorders. Am Fam Physician 1997 Nov 1;56(7):1781-8, 1791-2. "Recent estimates suggest that each year more than 1 million patients are injured while in the hospital and approximately 180,000 die because of these injuries. Furthermore, drug-related morbidity and mortality are common and are estimated to cost more than $136 billion a year."
  27. Starfield B. Is US health really the best in the world? JAMA 2000 Jul 26;284(4):483-5. These total to 225,000 deaths per year from iatrogenic causes."
  28. Taylor JA, Brownstein D, Christakis DA, Blackburn S, Strandjord TP, Klein EJ, Shafii J. Use of incident reports by physicians and nurses to document medical errors in pediatric patients. Pediatrics 2004 Sep;114(3):729-35. http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/114/3/729. "Medical errors in pediatric patients are significantly underreported in incident report systems, particularly by physicians."
  29. Osmon S, Harris CB, Dunagan WC, Prentice D, Fraser VJ, Kollef MH. Reporting of medical errors: an intensive care unit experience. Crit Care Med. 2004 Mar;32(3):727-33.
  30. Capuzzo M, Nawfal I, Campi M, Valpondi V, Verri M, Alvisi R. Reporting of unintended events in an intensive care unit: comparison between staff and observer. BMC Emerg Med. 2005 May 27;5(1):3. www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/5/3. "UE incidence is strongly underreported by staff in comparison with observers."
  31. Lehmann LS, Puopolo AL, Shaykevich S, Brennan TA. Iatrogenic events resulting in intensive care admission: frequency, cause, and disclosure to patients and institutions. Am J Med. 2005 Apr;118(4):409-13. "Health care professionals rarely document disclosure of iatrogenic events to patients and surrogates ... . The low rate of incidence report filing, however, suggests that, even when health care providers do discuss errors with patients, they do not disclose those conversations to the institution."
  32. Manga P, Angus D, Papadopoulos C, et al. The Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Chiropractic Management of Low-Back Pain. Richmond Hill, Ontario: Kenilworth Publishing; 1993.
  33. Meade TW, Dyer S, Browne W, Townsend J, Frank AO. Low-back pain of mechanical origin: randomised comparison of chiropractic and hospital outpatient treatment. BMJ 1990;300(6737):1431-7.
  34. Meade TW, Dyer S, Browne W, Frank AO. Randomised comparison of chiropractic and hospital outpatient management for low-back pain: results from extended follow up. BMJ 1995;311(7001):349-5.
  35. Legorreta AP, Metz RD, Nelson CF, Ray S, Chernicoff HO, Dinubile NA. Comparative analysis of individuals with and without chiropractic coverage: patient characteristics, utilization, and costs. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:1985-92. This article documented reduced health care expenses among patients with chiropractic coverage compared to patients lacking such coverage, suggesting that chiropractic access may reduce overall health care costs and utilization of more dangerous drug and surgical treatments. Further, population-wide adverse effects associated with chiropractic care were not discovered.
  36. Rosner AL. Evidence-based clinical guidelines for the management of acute low-back pain: response to the guidelines prepared for the Australian Medical Health and Research Council. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2001;24(3):214-20.
  37. Oliphant D. Safety of spinal manipulation in the treatment of lumbar disk herniations: a systematic review and risk assessment. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004;27:197-210.
  38. Vasquez A. Reducing Pain and Inflammation Naturally. Part 1: New Insights into Fatty Acid Biochemistry and the Influence of Diet. Nutritional Perspectives 2004; October: 5, 7-10, 12, 14. http://optimalhealthresearch.com/part1.
  39. Vasquez A. Reducing pain and inflammation naturally. Part 2: new insights into fatty acid supplementation and its effect on eicosanoid production and genetic expression. Nutritional Perspectives 2005; January: 5-16. http://optimalhealthresearch.com/part2.
  40. Vasquez A. Reducing pain and inflammation naturally. Part 3: Improving overall health while safely and effectively treating musculoskeletal pain. Nutritional Perspectives 2005; 28: 34-38, 40-42. http://optimalhealthresearch.com/part3.
  41. Al Faraj S, Al Mutairi K. Vitamin D deficiency and chronic low back pain in Saudi Arabia. Spine 2003 Jan 15;28(2):177-9.
  42. Dhesi JK, et al. Vitamin D supplementation improves neuromuscular function in older people who fall. Age Ageing 2004;33:589-95."This suggests that vitamin D supplementation improves neuromuscular or neuroprotective function, which may in part explain the mechanism whereby vitamin D reduces falls and fractures."
  43. Timms PM, Mannan N, Hitman GA, et al. Circulating MMP9, vitamin D and variation in the TIMP-1 response with VDR genotype: mechanisms for inflammatory damage in chronic disorders? QJM 2002 Dec;95(12):787-96.
  44. Pfeifer M, Begerow B, Minne HW, Nachtigall D, Hansen C. Effects of a short-term vitamin D(3) and calcium supplementation on blood pressure and parathyroid hormone levels in elderly women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001 Apr;86(4):1633-7.
  45. Vieth R, Kimball S, Hu A, Walfish PG. Randomized comparison of the effects of the vitamin D3 adequate intake versus 100 mcg (4000 IU) per day on biochemical responses and the wellbeing of patients. Nutr J. 2004 Jul 19;3:8.
  46. Vasquez A, Manso G, Cannell J. The clinical importance of vitamin D (cholecalciferol):  a paradigm shift with implications for all health care providers. Altern Ther Health Med. 2004 Sep-Oct;10(5):28-36. http://optimalhealthresearch.com/monograph04.
  47. Kaufman W. Niacinamide therapy for joint mobility. Therapeutic reversal of a common clinical manifestation of the "normal" aging process. Conn State Med J 1953;17:584-591.
  48. Maroon JC, Bost JW. Omega-3 fatty acids (fish oil) as an anti-inflammatory: an alternative to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for discogenic pain. Surg Neurol. 2006 Apr;65(4):326-31.
  49. Chrubasik S, Eisenberg E, Balan E, Weinberger T, Luzzati R, Conradt C. Treatment of low back pain exacerbations with willow bark extract: a randomized double-blind study. Am J Med. 2000 Jul;109(1):9-14. "CONCLUSION: Willow bark extract may be a useful and safe treatment for low back pain."
  50. Trickett P. Proteolytic enzymes in treatment of athletic injuries. Appl Ther. 1964;30:647-52. See also: Walker AF, Bundy R, Hicks SM, Middleton RW. Bromelain reduces mild acute knee pain and improves well-being in a dose-dependent fashion in an open study of otherwise healthy adults. Phytomedicine 2002;9:681-6. For nonmusculoskeletal considerations, see: Gonzalez NJ, Isaacs LL. Evaluation of pancreatic proteolytic enzyme treatment of adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, with nutrition and detoxification support. Nutr Cancer 1999;33(2):117-24; see also: Sakalova A, Bock PR, Dedik L, Hanisch J, Schiess W, Gazova S, Chabronova I, Holomanova D, Mistrik M, Hrubisko M. Retrolective cohort study of an additive therapy with an oral enzyme preparation in patients with multiple myeloma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2001 Jul;47 Suppl:S38-44.
  51. Goldhamer A, et al. Medically supervised water-only fasting in the treatment of hypertension. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2001 Jun;24(5):335-9.
  52. Goldhamer AC, et al. Medically supervised water-only fasting in the treatment of borderline hypertension. J Altern Complement Med. 2002 Oct;8(5):643-50.
  53. Goldhamer AC. Initial cost of care results in medically supervised water-only fasting for treating high blood pressure and diabetes. J Altern Complement Med. 2002 Dec;8(6):696-7.
  54. Vasquez A. "Nutritional Treatments for Hypertension." Naturopathy Digest 2006 November. www.naturopathydigest.com/archives/2006/nov/vasquez.php.
  55. Getzendanner S. Permanent injunction order against AMA. JAMA 1988 Jan 1;259(1):81-2. http://www.optimalhealthresearch.com/archives/wilk-ama-judgement.pdf.
  56. Wilk CA. Medicine, Monopolies, and Malice: How the Medical Establishment Tried to Destroy Chiropractic. Garden City Park: Avery, 1996.
  57. The osteopathic profession - labeled as "cultists" by the American Medical Association, which stated in 1953 that "... all voluntary associations with osteopaths are unethical" -was likewise faced with extinction, until merger with allopathic medicine was the only remaining strategy - a strategy which the medical profession believed would eventually destroy the osteopathic profession. In his review of osteopathic history, Gevitz* writes, "... the M.D.'s gradually came to believe that the only way to destroy osteopathy was through the absorption of D.O.'s, much as the homeopaths and eclectics had been swallowed up early in the century." Even today, the AMA continues to list osteopathic medicine under "alternative medicine,"** even though several osteopathic medical colleges have consistently provided training that is superior to most "conventional" medical schools.*** See the following references: *Gevitz N. The D.O.'s: Osteopathic Medicine in America. Johns Hopkins University Press; 1991; pages 100-103. **American Medical Association. Report 12 of the Council on Scientific Affairs (A-97). Full Text http://www.amaassn.org/ama/pub/category/13638.htmlon Feb. 15, 2005. *** Special report. America's best graduate schools. Schools of Medicine. The top schools: primary care. US News World Rep. 2004 Apr 12;136(12):74.
  58. Spivak JL. The Medical Trust Unmasked. Louis S. Siegfried Publishers; New York: 1961.
  59. Trever W. In the Public Interest. Los Angeles; Scriptures Unlimited; 1972. This is probably the most authoritative documentation of the illegal actions of the AMA up to 1972. It contains numerous photocopies of actual AMA documents and minutes of official meetings with overt intentionality of destroying Americans' health care options so that the AMA and related organizations would have a monopoly in national health care.
  60. Wolinsky H, Brune T. The Serpent on the Staff: The Unhealthy Politics of the American Medical Association. GP Putnam and Sons, New York, 1994.
  61. Carter JP. Racketeering in Medicine: The Suppression of Alternatives. Norfolk: Hampton Roads Pub; 1993.
  62. Daly R, American Psychiatric Association. AMA Forms Coalition to Thwart Non-M.D. Practice Expansion. Psychiatric News 2006 March; 41: 17. http://pn.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/41/5/17-a?eaf(accessed Nov. 25, 2006). "In an effort to marshal the medical community's resources against the growing threat of expanding scope of practice for allied health professionals, the AMA has formed a national partnership to confront such initiatives nationwide ... The committee will use $25,000."
  63. Physicians Ask Court to Protect Patients From Illegal Chiropractic Activities. www.texmed.org/Template.aspx?id=5259.
  64. Terrett AG. Misuse of the literature by medical authors in discussing spinal manipulative therapy injury. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1995;18(4):203-10.
  65. Morley J, Rosner AL, Redwood D. A case study of misrepresentation of the scientific literature: recent reviews of chiropractic. J Altern Complement Med. 2001 Feb;7(1):65-78.
  66. Wenban AB. Inappropriate use of the title 'chiropractor' and term 'chiropractic manipulation' in the peer-reviewed biomedical literature. Chiropr Osteopat. 2006 Aug 22;14:16. www.chiroandosteo.com/content/14/1/16.
  67. Seaman D. A Cure for the Curse of Chiropractic, Part One. Dynamic Chiropractic Jan. 29, 2007, Volume 25, Issue 03. www.chiroweb.com/archives/25/03/16.html.
  68. Palmer DD. The Science, Art, and Philosophy, of Chiropractic. Portland, OR; Portland Printing House Company, 1910: page 107.
  69. Beckman JF, Fernandez CE, Coulter ID. A systems model of health care: a proposal. J  Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1996 Mar-Apr; 19(3): 208-15.
  70. Himmelstein DU, Warren E, Thorne D, Woolhandler S. Illness and injury as contributors to bankruptcy. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Jan-Jun;Suppl Web Exclusives:W5-63-W5-73.
  71. Lazarou J, Pomeranz BH, Corey PN. Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. JAMA 1998;279:1200-5. "Even if the lower confidence limit of 76000 fatalities was used to be conservative, we estimated that ADRs could still constitute the sixth leading cause of death in the United States, after heart disease (743460), cancer (529904), stroke (150108), pulmonary disease (101077), and accidents (90523); this would rank ADRs ahead of pneumonia (75719) and diabetes (53894)."
  72. American Chiropractic Association. "Preface: Master Plan Definitions." www.amerchiro.org/level2_css.cfm?T1ID=10&T2ID=117(accessed Feb. 11, 2007).
  73. Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Ettner SL, Appel S, Wilkey S, Van Rompay M, Kessler RC. Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990-1997: results of a follow-up national survey. JAMA 1998;280:1569-75.

Dr. Alex Vasquez is a 1996 graduate of Western States Chiropractic College (Doctor of Chiropractic) 1999 graduate of Bastyr University (Doctor of Naturopathic Medicine), and 2010 graduate of University of North Texas Health Science Center, Texas College of Osteopathic Medicine (Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine). A prolific author with more than 70 published articles/papers and five books to his credit, Dr. Vasquez's two most recent texts are Chiropractic and Naturopathic Mastery of Common Clinical Disorders and Chiropractic Management of Chronic Hypertension; excerpts from the latter will be published as articles in DC in the coming months.

To report inappropriate ads, click here.